Mar
28
2009

Is “Earth Hour” meaningful, or just a stupid gimmick?

Ottawa Parliament Hill during Earth Hour 2008 (photo by David R Carroll - CC-BY)

Ottawa Parliament Hill during Earth Hour 2008 (photo by David R Carroll - CC-BY)

Earth Hour is a campaign to get everyone to switch off their lights for one hour. The 2009 Earth Hour runs from 8.30 to 9.30pm in everyone’s local timezone, on Saturday 28 March. But what’s the point?

The organizers paint it as “the world’s first global election, between Earth and global warming”. They aim to “collect” one billion votes to present to the next Global Climate Change conference.

The idea started in Sydney, Australia, in 2007 and has now spread around the world. So should you switch off your lights?

The effect on global warming of a one-hour switch-off is minimal. After all, one hour is just one-hundredth of one percent of a year so it’s barely going to make a dent in the annual energy consumption. And if only lights are being switched off, energy use will only drop a small amount during Earth Hour.

But the change will be sizeable enough to cause some frantic activity at the power generating stations, as staff hurriedly try to match supply to demand by shutting down generators, then by re-starting them when demand returns to normal at the end of the hour. In other words, it’s well and truly going to be noticed.

And even McDonald’s is going to turn off its “golden arches” signs in 500 of its locations.

Electric lights use much less power than electric cooking and heating. If you want to increase the effect, avoid using the following during earth hour: heaters, stoves, ovens, washing machines, tumble dryers, dishwashers, kettles, toasters, televisions, computers, electric water heaters and electric showers. Some people will also be turning off their fridges and freezers – but if you do that, don’t open the door during the hour, and don’t forget to turn them on again afterwards.

As I write this, countries just west of the International Date Line have already had their Earth Hour for this year.

Oh, and mains electricity is a relatively efficient form of lighting – certainly less environmentally harmful than battery-powered lighting or kerosene lanterns. Just thought you might like to know, in case you would prefer to gather in a darkened room with your family to tell ghost stories.

Anyway, as to whether “Earth Hour” is meaningful: there’s no doubt that it’s a symbolic gesture, but a gesture for a worthwhile cause that gets noticed must be more than a “stupid gimmick”.

(Update: Lighting was extinguished on landmarks around the world, including the Sydney Opera House, the Birds Nest Stadium, the UK Houses of Parliament and the Eiffel Tower.)

Related questions:

  • Solar storm (photo by NASA - PD)Can you get "green energy" when the sun's not shining?
    It is sometimes claimed that it's not possible for humans to depend entirely on renewable energy, because green energy is inherently unreliable and therefore it will always be necessary to have conve...
  • Damming the stream at Portheras Cove Beach (photo by Roger Browne - CC-BY)Are there any good beaches in the UK?
    After a news report about UK beaches whose water quality failed to meet regulatory standards, I heard someone say that they didn't know there were any good beaches in the United Kingdom. There certai...
  • Fruit and vegetables in colored mesh netting (photo by eiffel - CC-BY)Why are netted fruit and vegetables sold in colored nets?
    Fruit and vegetables are sometimes sold pre-bagged with fine plastic netting. The netting is usually colored, but how and why is the color chosen? Colored netting is used because it impro...
  • The manure spreader: an idea whose time had come in 1918 (image by dok1 - CC-BY)What are some ideas whose time has come?
    There are some ideas whose time has come, where the advantages greatly overwhelm the disadvantages, and where the idea can and should be implemented. Here is my "top three" list. Metrication ...
  • ivy on a wallDoes Ivy damage walls?
    This has been a subject of debate for many years and has particularly exercised the minds of those involved in the heritage industry who protect, conserve and restore our architectural heritage. ...

  Need research? Quezi's researchers can answer your questions at uclue.com

No Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL


Leave a Reply

Privacy Policy | Acknowledgements